An international organization bought an AI tool six months ago. Their teams started using it independently last month. SIX MONTHS. Not because the tool was complicated but because everything around it was.

Between "we want to adopt an AI tool" and "our teams are actually using it," this is what it took: I evaluated nine tools for them. The organization needed to run those options through internal governance, compliance layers, and approval hierarchies. Once they picked one Easygenerator they didn't bring me in to train people in a room. They brought me in to build the entire training system from scratch.

That meant testing the tool myself first. Learning how their teams actually work. Understanding what they used to do manually and slowly, and figuring out how AI-assisted workflows could realistically replace that. Then designing the onboarding architecture, building the video series, writing the scripts, recording everything with Camtasia and AI-generated narration, going through review cycles with the project coordinator, correcting, adapting and delivering final assets that teams across the world could use on their own time.

After six months doing this, I know now: the real work lives between "we chose a tool" and "people are using it." Instructional design. Workflow translation. Governance alignment. Prompt engineering guidance. Making AI understandable for people who didn't ask for it and have their own job to do.

Without that layer, you buy a tool, send a login link and wonder why adoption dies after week two.

Today, their Working Groups are creating training content independently. Not because the tool is magic, because someone BUILT THE BRIDGE between the technology and the people who needed to use it.

That bridge is what I do. If your team has a tool but not the adoption, happy to talk ✋

PS: Yes, I built the training about the AI tool using AI tools. Inception-level consulting 😄